Free Lux Week

qaera · 2012-05-23T10:29:06.999305+00:00

I call shenanigans.

A free week Lux wouldn't bother with the shield at all

qaera · 2012-05-23T10:23:19.823558+00:00

They get that idea because Lux runs into mana problems very quickly if you can't manage her abilities just right. They're on short cooldown so you want to spam them, but her mana pool is too small to sustain that for long, especially early game.

I'd rather see someone running Clarity than just sitting out of mana constantly.

fluuxx · 2012-05-23T10:12:24.580096+00:00

Crying? So you're Amumu, playing on a computer old as he is? :-D

fluuxx · 2012-05-23T10:10:21.582880+00:00

That would be nice, but for people on low-spec computers it might cause things to become unresponsive, which is definitely NOT what you want at champion select.

Aphoristic · 2012-05-23T08:13:05.991538+00:00

Most other AoE abilities are much easier to see. As one of the reds put it, it's unfair that ability was only so strong because it was hard to see coming.

xmido · 2012-05-22T04:34:30.269804-07:00

In short, once you've authenticated the system gives you a session ID. If an attacker gets that ID, they bypass all the security because the security system has already verified everything.

Apparently Diablo 3 discloses your session ID to all other players in your group (and possibly others; I'm not sure from the comments) which makes it much easier for someone to get the data they'd need to run such an attack. The only way you, as a player, can completely prevent such an account takeover is to not play multiplayer at all until this is fixed.

iliar · 1 day

So give him a nerf gun of his own.

jibelite · 1 day

Serious question then: How? I have a similar problem.

I'm aware that solo queue would probably be an improvement over what he's describing.

xmido · 1 day

From your forum link:

In addition, using an Authenticator can help secure your account even more.

That's... just not even close to being true, if this attack works as it has been described. I guess they're trying to come up with anything to keep players from doubting the security of their system.

frEmn · 1 day

It certainly seems to be. Most of the rest of the world appears to have accepted that global warming is happening and recognizes that it's likely to cause all kinds of problems.

frEmn · 1 day

Because a lot of Americans are ignorant when it comes to science and there's a lot of money being spent to try and discredit scientists.

cutefbpics · 1 day

Like you wouldn't bend over for Bowser.

cutefbpics · 1 day

From what I understand, anything oil-based is a bad idea for anal play for sanitary reasons and could potentially lead to bacterial infection.

Obvious_Porn_Account · 1 day

If it's a really bad website that is likely to crash, sure. In general I think it's much better to link to the original source so people can easily see what else the artist has on display.

lovegaymale · 1 day

Link's weapon is called the Master Sword for a reason.

HereComesDrTran · 1 day

That's not correct. If it were, subtracting 100 armor would let you one-shot anyone. With the way the formula works, at infinitely negative armor a target would take double damage.

To rephrase what you've said, subtracting 45 armor reduces their effective health against physical damage by 45% of their actual health.

coc4all · 2 days

Deal, but only if I get to play with your balls too. ;)

Recitavis · 2 days

To clarify: Any abilities that say they're on-hit effects are reliant on life steal, not spell vamp. Teemo's poison would, in theory, fall into that category. His mushrooms aren't reliant on autoattacks and therefore would be based on spell vamp instead.

On-hit item effects (such as Madred's Bloodrazor) apparently proc neither life steal nor spell vamp. If I'm wrong about this, someone please correct me.

geeksdontdance · 2 days

This isn't true at every crossing, though. When I used the crossing near Niagara Falls, I had to pay a toll going into Canada and a "customs fee" coming back into the United States.

Gilese581 · 2 days

Play the in-game tutorials before you get into an actual game. You'll actually SEE how a lot of the basics work.

Past that, there are sites with guides on how to play champions. Try out as many of the free-to-play ones as you can, then once you find someone you enjoy playing, look up a guide to get some ideas.

HereComesDrTran · 3 days

tl;dr of that: Reducing someone's armor by 45 points increases physical damage by roughly 30% at anything up to 100 armor.

LoLisQuiteGood · 3 days

$15 to $20 is a pretty common price point for a bottom-tier connection. For a casual user (e.g. someone's parents who do little more than check e-mail), there's little point in paying more, even if a 6 mbit connection can be had for $30.

TropicalUrchin · 3 days

Lux is a fantastic champion for a new player to learn for exactly that reason. All her abilities are skillshots and all have a very different use.

JamieSackville · 3 days

Dear goodness. I'm apparently not the only one whose musical tastes defy a concise description. Vivaldi seems particularly appropriate when playing Sona.

potatozzminions · 3 days

We (the balance team) understand that this mechanic on its own, if implemented, would be a nerf to Cho'Gath. We have no intention of nerfing Cho'Gath this patch.

I think you're trying way too hard to read something into that statement that just isn't there.

Pixelpaws

TROPHY CASE

Pixelpaws

TROPHY CASE

you'll need to login or register to do that

create a new account

login